|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on May 7, 2012 4:49:05 GMT -5
She easily could, and on top of that, she could've had 2 GRANTED Jury votes with them being over here if she wanted to go against the *best*.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Byars on May 7, 2012 7:16:33 GMT -5
I think if Sydney says she took Chelsea to the end because she wanted to win against the best, I might give her a bigger chance at my vote, just because it would show she didn't take the easy way out. And it would show some confidence on the game she played, I have always hated when people take two pawns because it makes me feel like they know they didn't play all that great so they had to go against trash to win. This. I always respect a players game more when they have confidence in their own game for face the best in an attempt to win. This should make for a very interesting end. |
|
|
|
Post by Chase Rice on May 7, 2012 10:47:02 GMT -5
I agreed with Sandras post about Matt. If syd wanted to take on the best she should have went with Matt and Chelsea for the finals, but I get why she didnt
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Chiesl on May 7, 2012 18:14:56 GMT -5
Mick and Tom EPIC FAIL in the last immunity challenge....
But that is to be expected.
Yes it will be a tough decision between Chelsea and Sydney and really want to find out more about their game in Final TC
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on May 7, 2012 22:39:47 GMT -5
I totally agree with you, Semhar. I also do have nothing against you, becase this is just a game. I tried talking things out with Shawna, but she acted like a kid. I don't hold grudges either so I don't see why we couldn't fix it.  Sandra, I would have been fine with your apology if it was sincere and if you didn't start going into your usual rant and attempting to revive old arguments which should just be left to die.... I'll never believe you about certain things so don't keep trying to convince me. If you really want to "fix" things then let's just try to refrain from the personal comments and talk about the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on May 7, 2012 22:53:29 GMT -5
Wow, a lot to catch up on here, lol. I Basically agree that it's going to be between Sydney/Chelsea but I don't have as much of a dislike of Tom as some of you have. Bottom line, I like that everyone is talking this out but I'm with Semhar about going into this with a completely open mind. I think it's easier for some of us since it's been a while since I was voted out and I was very distant from this alliance, anyway. That being said, I agree that if Sydney keeps Chelsea she could be making a fatal mistake. I am looking forward to finally hearing what they have to say for themselves, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Host Lex on May 8, 2012 11:04:30 GMT -5
Final Tribal is up! Make sure you're checking back for their opening statements. Think of your questions in the meantime if you haven't!
|
|
|
|
Post by Semhar Tadesse on May 8, 2012 12:06:44 GMT -5
I hate thinking... it's too hard.
|
|
|
|
Post by The One and Only BOB DAWG on May 8, 2012 12:09:19 GMT -5
You could go with if you were a power ranger what color would you be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chase Rice on May 8, 2012 14:12:53 GMT -5
They better say Black, cause black is beautiful
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Byars on May 8, 2012 14:34:57 GMT -5
My god Chelsea can talk. Good opener though, it'll be interesting to see what Syd/Tom have to follow with
|
|
|
|
Post by Semhar Tadesse on May 8, 2012 16:48:46 GMT -5
Are you really surprised though? Chelsea is a natural speaker, she could sell an orange to an orange vendor, seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on May 8, 2012 18:58:58 GMT -5
Are you really surprised though? Chelsea is a natural speaker, she could sell an orange to an orange vendor, seriously. I'm pretty sure orange vendors need to buy oranges. Love ya Semhar.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Chiesl on May 8, 2012 20:43:53 GMT -5
I really like both Chelsea and Sydney's speeches and think they both deserve it.
I still think Sydney is leading though, and I completely understood/understand her game throughout, and still think she had more control.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on May 8, 2012 20:48:46 GMT -5
I guess I'm not surprised both Chelsea and Sydney already got the "pre-existing relationships/pre-game alliances" elephant in the room addressed right up front. That's cool, it just gives me more options for questions now. So far Chelsea leads for me due to her opening versus Sydney's...but Tom still has a chance to take the point.  |
|
