|
|
Post by Chase Rice on Apr 29, 2012 2:45:39 GMT -5
Naw it was Mick, Tom and Sandra who voted Matt I think
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Byars on Apr 29, 2012 2:52:30 GMT -5
Naw it was Mick, Tom and Sandra who voted Matt I think :-! I think I know but don't wanna say lol I hope Sandra pulls through though because I think the dynamics would be a lot less predictable if she did |
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Apr 29, 2012 2:53:38 GMT -5
Why don't you want to say? You're on the jury - you're supposed to say!
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Apr 29, 2012 2:54:35 GMT -5
Whose parchments are these?   |
|
|
|
Post by Chase Rice on Apr 29, 2012 2:57:10 GMT -5
Orange is Syd, Blue is Matt. Thats how its always been
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Apr 29, 2012 3:10:09 GMT -5
Okay, well it's good to know Mick isn't Sydney's slave as Stephanie said. I think one of the Matt-voters will switch and vote Sandra. They know Sandra will never beat Matt in a tie-break challenge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Byars on Apr 29, 2012 4:05:25 GMT -5
Fine, I think the votes went
Matt - Sydney, Mick, Sandra
Sandra - Chelsea, Matt, Tom
Mick gave Sydney his idol and I think they worked together to get her 2nd, but not 100% sure on that. The parchment thing obviously destroys my thoughts though, but I think Syd knew how the votes would fall and just tied them for some reason, switching my vote thoughts around (switch Syd and Tom), in the re-vote I see Matt going with Chelsea being the only vote keeping him, but eh we'll see. Sydney is playing a very clever game and right now is leading my vote to win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Chiesl on Apr 29, 2012 8:37:45 GMT -5
Yes Sydney is also the front runner for me as well. I could tell she was the one running things, but she was like one of the only people to talk to me so any moves I could make could only go through her which sucked since I saw her as a threat.
I think what Jay said is correct.
Syd Matt and Chelsea voted Sandra and Mick Sandra and Tom voted Matt.
I think like Jay said, Sydney was supposed to vote Matt and didn't but now is going to in the re-vote so Matt will be joining us next I think :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay Byars on Apr 29, 2012 13:23:58 GMT -5
I think this vote said it all  When you openly betray people it makes you hard to trust the rest of the game, but eh good game Matt, welcome to the jury! |
|
|
|
Post by Semhar Tadesse on Apr 29, 2012 13:34:51 GMT -5
My heart broke with that re-vote. I sure hope we have at least two good people at the Finals aka Sydney and Chelsea or else it's going to be a snooze. Welcome Matt, great game!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chase Rice on Apr 29, 2012 13:46:46 GMT -5
Sydney may end up eating her own words if people decide she betrayed people and don't wanna take her beyond final 4
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Apr 29, 2012 14:04:36 GMT -5
Well, looks like Chelsea, at least, is toast.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shawna Mitchell on Apr 29, 2012 14:16:23 GMT -5
So, in a way I don't like these results and in a way I do. Out of the three who I thought were playing the best/running the game, Matt was the one person I thought was least likely to get my vote. But, all this talk about how everyone was going to let these three walk away with the game...well at least people had a plan. If the final three turns out to be Mick, Tom and Sandra I agree it will suck to make one of those the winner so I am hoping the Sydney manages to make her way to the finals. I would bet on Chelsea most, I guess. Despite what I said above, she is the one person who could win out as long as the immunities are skill-based.
Anyway, right now I do hope at least one of Sydney/Chelsea are in the end. If not, I would probably vote Tom over Mick at this point (Sandra will never get my vote).
|
|
|
|
Post by Chase Rice on Apr 29, 2012 14:19:30 GMT -5
I think final 4 will be Chelsea, Sydney, Sandra and Tom...it could happen haha I hope it's Mick next so I can brag about calling the final 4 |
|
|
|
Post by Stephanie Valencia on Apr 30, 2012 15:20:41 GMT -5
I will never vote for Tom. That is all. Hi.
|
|
