|
Post by Host Lex on May 2, 2012 21:47:24 GMT -5
Tribal Council #17 - BlitzkriegHello friends! I'll now bring in the members of the jury. Chase Semhar Sekou Shawna Jay Stephanie Savage Mike And Matt, voted out at the last Tribal Council IMMUNE: TomQuestions: Chelsea: You didn't seem too pleased with the Tribal results last week. Are you upset over it? Do you feel vulnerable tonight? Mick: You weren't able to finish tonight's challenge. Is this part of your strategy at all? Do you think this could ultimately hurt your game? Sandra: You narrowly escaped yet another vote last week. Do you think you're a threat at this point? Would it be smart to take you out? Sydney: Last week, you stirred things up a bit. How do you think the Jury perceives your game? Are you worried about that at all, or do you feel confident? Tom: Three wins in a row! Are you surprised? Do you think these wins are keeping you alive, or putting a target on your back? Be sure to vote in the "Voting History" thread provided to you in your confessionals. You have 24 hours to do so. Any vote after 24 hours will not count, and if all the votes are in, we reserve the right to post results early. Be sure to leave a bootlist to prevent self voting. Also make sure you answer these questions and have some confessionals for this round!
|
|
|
Post by Mick Trimming on May 2, 2012 22:01:12 GMT -5
Mick: You weren't able to finish tonight's challenge. Is this part of your strategy at all? Do you think this could ultimately hurt your game?
Honestly, I never expected an aim type puzzle challenge to take an hour (or more) or I wouldn't have attempted to start the challenge at that time. I think my track record shows I don't skip challenges. I hope bad timing doesn't hurt me this time, but you never know.
|
|
|
Post by Sydney Wheeler on May 2, 2012 22:17:50 GMT -5
Sydney: Last week, you stirred things up a bit. How do you think the Jury perceives your game? Are you worried about that at all, or do you feel confident? When you make comments like that, and especially after the results of Matt's departure, it makes me think they are probably unhappy with my decisions. But I'm not really worried about how I'm "perceived" because they don't know what's going on in my head. They also don't know what is going on in the other player's heads either - that can only be explained for those fortunate enough to make the end of the game.
|
|
|
Post by Chelsea Meissner on May 2, 2012 23:53:21 GMT -5
Chelsea: You didn't seem too pleased with the Tribal results last week. Are you upset over it? Do you feel vulnerable tonight?
Lol, no. I wasn't pleased at all. I don't really want to rant and rave about it right now, but yeah, I wasn't really happy with the outcome at all. No offense to Sandra, well I guess some offense, but I don't think she deserves to be here over Matt? I just saw it as Matt deserved to be here more. And plus, I like Matt. I like everyone left here, but Matt was one of the people I was working with at the very start of the game. It sucks to see someone go that you've been playing all game with. I was blindsided by the vote. But, yeah. I can see the reasoning for taking him out too. He was a good player, had a great shot at winning the game.
Do I feel vulnerable tonight? Eh. As we saw last week, you should always feel vulnerable. You never know what happens. I know that I was super confident in the fact that Sandra was going and as you can see, she didn't. I hope she goes tonight though. I'd say better her than me, obv. Nothing personal, Sandra. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on May 3, 2012 0:17:05 GMT -5
LMAO, Chelsea, you can't be real for once in your answer, can you? You had something against me as you admitted and that has nothing to do with me deserving or not to still be here. You don't know why I wasn't around for some challenges, so, yeah. And then about you and Matt working since the start of the game .. rofl. Little did people know is that infact you and him were BFF rather me and you as it was pegged all game long.
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on May 3, 2012 0:20:12 GMT -5
Sandra: You narrowly escaped yet another vote last week. Do you think you're a threat at this point? Would it be smart to take you out? |
I am definitely not a threat in any way at this point. I haven't been a shining star at challenges and I am disliked by the Jury a lot as we all can tell. Therefor I don't think it'd be smart to take me out when there're other more threating people still left in the game.
|
|
|
Post by Chelsea Meissner on May 3, 2012 0:31:26 GMT -5
LMAO, Chelsea, you can't be real for once in your answer, can you? You had something against me as you admitted and that has nothing to do with me deserving or not to still be here. You don't know why I wasn't around for some challenges, so, yeah. And then about you and Matt working since the start of the game .. rofl. Little did people know is that infact you and him were BFF rather me and you as it was pegged all game long. Be real? I am being real! I do have something against you. But that doesn't really even coincide with what I was saying. The fact of the matter is you DON'T deserve to be here. You've missed far more challenges than you really should have, you've been asleep the majority of the game, and you've been pretty much a bitch to anyone and everyone that's even engaged in a conversation with you, with the exception of a few people. But not only that, you've got the loosest set of lips I have ever encountered in a game as of late. I have never once been a game where someone has ran their mouth as much as you. Learn to keep your mouth shut once in a while and maybe you wouldn't burn bridges so easily. People didn't know Matt and I were close that way? Oh. I wasn't trying to hide that fact from the Jury. In fact it was kind of obvious and people caught on as the game went on. So throwing it in my face right now really doesn't change anything. The majority of the reason you're still even here is because of existing relationships. And I told you that straight to your face last round. That's why when I found out Jay wanted to target me, he was able to be taken out, because he didn't have those strong, sturdy connections. However, I've known about you wanting me out for quite some time, and I've been very patient. And now I hope to God that you go out this week like you need to. We weren't BFFs in this game; you were too busy trying to pick up my sloppy seconds. Bobby Jon? Ring a bell?
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on May 3, 2012 1:46:26 GMT -5
LMAO, Chelsea. I need to go now, but i will answer this later. You're just completely blind to my game. The only thing you know about is me missing challenges. And no, I am not having loose lips because if I had, I would spill it to more people. Fact of the mattter is you're trying to work the Jury here while making up stuff and using excuses.
|
|
|
Post by Sandra Diaz-Twine on May 3, 2012 1:50:46 GMT -5
Plus, I've been a bitch only to Shawna, Semhar and Bobby Jon. But excuse me, mighty you knows everything. Not.
|
|
Tom Westman
Blitzkrieg
I'm good at riding poles :)
Posts: 927
|
Post by Tom Westman on May 3, 2012 6:36:37 GMT -5
Tom: Three wins in a row! Are you surprised? Do you think these wins are keeping you alive, or putting a target on your back?
Oh I know! I am definitely surprised considering who my competitions are here. Never would I have thought I'd be winning these immunities all in a row when you have dominant players like Sydney and Chelsea. And I mean winning immunity keeps yourself alive in this game so I would think that it is keeping me alive and that I am here to play too. Everyone here left though knows I don't really have that many fans in jury as well so winning immunities doesn't necessarily mean I should have a target on my back but it feels good to be able to compete against these people and being able to snatch that win from them.
|
|