|
|
Post by Host Lex on May 8, 2012 0:35:46 GMT -5
Finale time! Woo!
Chelsea vs. Sydney. Tom...has no shot. Sorry Tommy
How do you guys think it will go? I think it'll be verrryyyy close. People seem very split between Chelsea and Sydney.
Who do you guys think played the best game? Who would you vote for?
|
|
|
|
Post by no on May 8, 2012 1:00:48 GMT -5
Hm...
I think socially they were both spot on.
Syd has more challenge wins to show and was in possession of both idols, but that was because of Mick.
Syd had a lot of friends.
It's hard to say.
I think they played almost as even of games as you could possibly play. =P
|
|
|
|
Post by Ted Rogers on May 8, 2012 6:22:29 GMT -5
Finale time! Woo! Chelsea vs. Sydney. Tom...has no shot. Sorry Tommy How do you guys think it will go? I think it'll be verrryyyy close. People seem very split between Chelsea and Sydney. Who do you guys think played the best game? Who would you vote for? YES FINALLY A FINAL 3. A Final 2 may have ended up with Tom and made the ending very one-sided. Its a tough choice between the 2. Sydney played a phenominal social game and was always able to keep herself in a position of power. I feel Chelsea did as well all the way until the Final 6, but by the Final 6 she was at the mercy of Sydney, and if Sydney had truly wanted Chelsea would have been on the jury. My vote would probably go to Sydney in this case. |
|
|
|
Post by Andrea Boehlke on May 8, 2012 9:51:08 GMT -5
Should have made this a final 2, usually a final 3 with a person who has no shot is pointless. And Sydney would've still won immunity 'cause it was endurance.  |
|
|
|
Post by Ashley Underwood on May 8, 2012 15:19:12 GMT -5
I love this final 3! But sadly Tom has no chance. This must be hell for them since it's 11 jurors and most likely people will ask stupid questions like John did last season.
I think I would vote for Sydney because she always was in control and got her way. It is too close to call!
|
|
|
|
Post by The One and Only BOB DAWG on May 8, 2012 15:22:28 GMT -5
Should have made this a final 2, usually a final 3 with a person who has no shot is pointless. And Sydney would've still won immunity 'cause it was endurance. If its a final 2 that pointless person is usually there again I'd vote for Chelsea to win. |
|
|
|
Post by Rory THE CRUSHER Freeman on May 8, 2012 15:37:20 GMT -5
GO TOM  |
|
|
|
Post by Colby Donaldson on May 8, 2012 16:21:27 GMT -5
Probably Sydney. She had more power and controlled the latter half of the game well, And Chelsea was pretty much at her mercy. That's the main difference between them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Candice Woodcock on May 8, 2012 16:29:57 GMT -5
I'd vote for Sydney over Chelsea. While I think they both played great games and both deserve it, I perceived Sydney of having control of the game. Of course I'm pretty ignorant of the first like, month of the game, so I have no idea what happened before then.
|
|
|
|
Post by The One and Only BOB DAWG on May 8, 2012 16:37:09 GMT -5
Chelsea made more new realtionships in this game while Sydney just relied on her old realtionships to help her go farther. Chelsea had a more difficult path with all the complications with Bobby Jon and the bad tribe swap. Idk I'm kind of biased though. Should be an awesome battle and both would be very deserving winners.
|
|
|
|
Post by no on May 8, 2012 17:27:26 GMT -5
I feel Chelsea did as well all the way until the Final 6, but by the Final 6 she was at the mercy of Sydney, and if Sydney had truly wanted Chelsea would have been on the jury. But isn't that what Survivor is? Look at what happened to Kat. Kat was in a good position, had a good connection with Kim who wanted to take her to final 3...but then a few others decided it was her time to go and so she went. What I mean is Survivor is all about your connections. If you make the right ones it could save you when it's your time to go. Chelsea wasn't really saved, she had a strong bond with Sydney which kept any sort of target off her back. That's a good social game. You need people like that to survive in Survivor. |
|
|
|
Post by Andrea Boehlke on May 8, 2012 18:22:11 GMT -5
Should have made this a final 2, usually a final 3 with a person who has no shot is pointless. And Sydney would've still won immunity 'cause it was endurance. If its a final 2 that pointless person is usually there again I'd vote for Chelsea to win. If Sydney won the challenge (which I'm positive she would), I bet she would take Chelsea since she was loyal to her on Day 1. |
|
|
|
Post by no on May 8, 2012 19:35:56 GMT -5
I agree with Bob Dawg though.
You all say Sydney controlled the game, but it wasn't hard given all her "Pre-existing relationships" as Chelsea called them.
Not to take away from anything Shadow Sydney did because he she played a PHENOMENAL game (I think far better than HvsV where he was kind of in the position that Chelsea was with kind of tagging and being saved just because of the relationship he had with Chels) but I don't want to take away from Chelsea's game either because she played a great one as well.
Chelsea and I were talking today and it seems this game turned out EXACTLY like HvsV did. Chelsea had her #1 (Matt) (HvsV Chels had Sally), and Sydney took that person out. She idol'd Sally in HvsV and then voted Matt out here. Sydney got to the end with a friend (In this case Tom, in HvsV it was Ashley) and Chelsea is there as well.
Kind of funny looking at that how similar these games played out for them.
But regardless, both played phenomenal games!! And both would be highly deserving!
But in case Chelsea DOES win, I CALLED IT ON DAY 1!!! =X
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrea Boehlke on May 8, 2012 19:54:00 GMT -5
That just shows how small the org world really is and it's all the same people mostly playing in every org. |
|
|
|
Post by The One and Only BOB DAWG on May 8, 2012 20:24:48 GMT -5
Thats why alias is fun but people sometimes SUCK AT ALIAS *glances at Kimmy*
|
|
